Online incivility: exploring from Malaysian academic perspective (IR)

Nurul Ain Hidayah Abas

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Nurul Ain Hidayah Abas
Additional Authors :	Marinah Awang
Title :	Online incivility: exploring from Malaysian academic perspective (IR)

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract :

In the evolving globalization in Malaysia, many organizations employ online communication platform for faster decision making, easier collaboration on assignments and greater recognition of employees for achievement and rewards. However, this additional medium of communication posts a risk of uncivil online comments that can lead to lower unproductively among employees that reduces employees’ well-being and increases organizations costs. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the negative consequences of online incivility, in particular in Malaysia, considering aspect of negative moods as possible mediator in the relationship. In addition, problem solving conflict management styles is also discussed as a social support that may decrease the negative consequences of online incivility based from sound literature review. Plausible hypotheses are also then derived from the constructive arguments. This study is consistent with the objectives of Eleventh Malaysian Plan (2016-2020) and Transformasi Nasional 2050 (TN50) to improve the nations’ well being and productivity from perceiving the positive and work harmony created. In practical, the study can help shape policies and guidelines involving human-technology interaction for the decision makers by incorporating aspects of human psychological well-being that can be affected by technology through the online paradigm.

References

1. Abas, N. A. H., & Otto, K. (2016). Interpersonal mistreatment, organizational attitudes and wellbeing: The impact of instigator’s hierarchical position and demographic characteristics. Organization Management Journal. doi: 10.1080/15416518.2015.1129307 2. Abas, N. A. H., Otto, K., & Thurasamy, R. (2015). The relationship between depressive symptoms and job satisfaction in a collectivistic culture: The moderating role of cultural embeddedness. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 29(1), 1–20. 3. Aboujaoude E., Savage M. W., Starcevic V., & Salame W. O. (2015). Cyberbullying: Review of an old problem gone viral. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57, 10–18. doi: 10.1016/2015.04.011 4. American Associations of University Professors, AAUP (2015). AAUP Policy and Reports.Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press 5. Antoci, A., Delfino, A., Paglieri, F., Panebianco, F., & Sabatini, F. (2016) Civility vs. incivility in online social interactions: An evolutionary approach. PLoS ONE, 11(11): e0164286. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164286 6. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,13, 217-231. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13ResearchP217 -231Bouhnik0601.pdf 7. Connected Life (2015). Retrieved from https://www.tns infratest.com/wissensforum/studien/pdf/connected-life-2015-summary-sheet.pdf 8. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility at the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80. 9. De Gagne, J. C., Choi, M., Ledbetter, L., Kang, H., & Clark, C. M. (2016). An integrative review of cybercivility in health professions education. Nurse Educator, 41(5). doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000264 10. De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 645-668. doi: 10.1002/job.107 11. Dilmaç, B. (2017). The Relationship between Adolescents' Levels of Hopelessness and Cyberbullying: The Role of Values. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(4), 1119-1133. doi:10.12738/estp.2017.4.0610 12. Duggan, M. & Smith, A. (2014). Social Media Update 2013. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-Media-Update.aspx 13. Economic Planning Unit (EPU) (2013). The Malaysian Well-Being Report 2013. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/sites/default/files/Pembentangan%20MWI%202013_2Disember %202013.pdf 14. Fahie, D. & Devine, D. (2014). The Impact of Workplace Bullying on Primary School Teachers and Principals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 235–252. 15. Giumetti, G. W., McKibben, E. S., Hatfield, A. L., Schroeder, A. N., & Kowalski, R. M. (2012). Cyber Incivility @ Work: The New Age of Interpersonal Deviance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(3), 148-154. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0336 16. Gross, M. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim's organizational conflict styles. International journal of conflict management, 11(3), 200-226. 17. Hair J. F., Hult G. T. M., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Health and Safety Authority (2001). Report of the Expert Advisory Group on Workplace Bullying. Retrieved from http://www.hsa.ie/eng/ 18. Hohwü, L., Lyshol, H., Gissler, M., Jonsson, S. H., Petzold, M., & Obel, C. (2013). Web-Based Versus Traditional Paper Questionnaires: A Mixed-Mode Survey with a Nordic Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8). doi:.http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2595 19. Karaj, S. (2013). Teachers stress in Albania: examining the role of students’ classroom deviant behavior and other factors in school context. Proceedings from 1st Albania International Conference on Education (AICE). 20. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618 21. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1972). Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. 22. Kuala Lumpur Federal Territory Education Department. (2017). Retrieved from http://jpwpkl.moe.gov.my/index.php/en/ 23. Marcoulides, G. A., Chin, W. W., & Saunders, C. (2012). When imprecise statistical statements become problematic: a response to Goodhue, Lewis, and Thompson. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 717–728. 24. Meier L. L., Gross S., Spector P. E., & Semmer N. K. (2013). Relationship and task conflict at work: interactive short-term effects on angry mood and somatic complaints. J. Occup.Health Psychol. 18, 144–156. doi: 10.1037/a003209 25. Natarajan, J., Muliira, J. K., & van der Colff (2017). Incidence and perception of nursing students’ academic incivility in Oman. BMC Nursing, 16(19). doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0213-7 26. Ng, W. (2016). Use of positive interventions: Does neuroticism moderate the sustainability of their effects on happiness? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(1). doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1025419 27. Ojanen, T. T., Boonmongkon, P., Samakkeekarom, R., Samoh, N., Cholratana, M., Payakkakom, 28. A., & Guadamuz, T. E. (2014). Investigating online harassment and offline violence among young people in Thailand: methodological approaches, lessons learned. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(9), 1097-1112. doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.931464 29. Pinar, S. E., Cesur, B., Koca, M., Sayin, N., & Sancak, F. (2017). Emotional intelligence levels and cyberbullying sensibility among Turkish university students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 676-685. doi:10.15345/iojes.2017.03.008 30. Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D., & Psenicka, C. (2001). A structural equations model of leader power, subordinates'styles of handling conflict, and job performance. International journal of conflict management, 12(3), 191-211. 31. Rahim, M. A., Magner, N. R., & Shapiro, D. L. (2000). Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors?: What justice perceptions, precisely?. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 9-31. 32. Raiman, L., Antbring, R., & Mahmood, A. (2017). WhatsApp messenger as a tool to supplement medical education for medical students on clinical attachment. BMC Med Educ., 17(1).doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0855-x.I 33. Rösner, L., Winter, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 461–470. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.022 34. Sabella, R. A., Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2013). Cyberbullying myths and realities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2703–2711.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.040. Selangor State Education Department Official Portal. (2017). Retrieved from http://jpnselangor.moe.gov.my/ 35. Shih, H. A., & Susanto, E. (2010). Conflict management styles, emotional intelligence, and job performance in public organizations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(2),147-168. 36. Skelton, J. A, & Croyle, R. T. (Eds.) (2012). Mental Representation in Health and Illness. New York. NY: Springer-Verlag. 37. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070 38. Vagharseyyedin, S. A. (2015). Workplace incivility: a concept analysis. Journal of Contemporary Nurse, 50(1), 115–125. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2015.1010262 39. Van Lange, P. A. M. & van Doesum, N. J. (2012). The Psychology of Interaction Goals Comes as a Package, Psychological Inquiry, 23(1). 75–79.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page